Could Georgia's
anti-immigration law already have ill effects?
AP wrote May 20, 2011,
Immigration crackdown worries Vidalia onion county:
Signs point to an exodus in Vidalia onion country. Fliers on a
Mexican storefront advertise free transportation for workers willing
to pick jalapenos and banana peppers in Florida and blueberries in the
Carolinas. Buying an outbound bus ticket now requires reservations.
While most states rejected immigration crackdowns this year, conservative
Georgia and Utah are the only states where comprehensive bills have
passed. With the ink barely dry on Georgia's law, among the toughest
in the country, the divisions between suburban voters and those in
the countryside are once again laid bare when it comes to immigration,
even among people who line up on many other issues.
Guess who wanted this crackdown even though rural south Georgians didn't:
The crackdown proved popular in suburban Atlanta, where Spanish-only
signs proliferate and the Latino population has risen dramatically over
the past few decades. Residents complain that illegal immigrants take
their jobs and strain public resources.
That's right: Atlanta, not content with lusting after our water,
now scares off our workers.
Do immigrants really take jobs from locals?
Such claims never seem to have data to back them up.
I tend to agree with
Carlos Santana:
"This is about fear, that people are going to steal my job," Santana said
of the law. "No we ain’t. You don’t clean toilets and clean sheets,
stop shucking and jiving."
In south Georgia local people won't pick Vidalia onions for the wages
immigrants will, and the wages locals want the farmers can't afford.
Remember who profits from this crackdown, at the expense of Georgia
farmers and taxpayers:
private prison companies and their investors.
We don't need a private prison in Lowndes County.
Spend those tax dollars on education instead.
-jsq
PS: Vidalia onion story owed to Jane Osborn.
the blog of LAKE, the Lowndes Area Knowledge Exchange
Sounds to me like he's saying the issues are resolved.
Remember,
"resolved" is the word Chairman Paulk used a few hours before.
“It’s no longer a case of an individual making a claim, as it will be evident by the physical evidence provided by the security cameras,” said Pritchard. “The standard operating procedures such as frequency of inspection of the animals and how often an animal will be reviewed or examined, along with the veterinarian care, have been revised to the general procedures set by guidelines of the Department of Agriculture and the animal control ordinance we adopted several years ago.”
Recent Comments