Equal opportunity criticizer —John S. Quarterman

Leigh Touchton remarked:

...apparently Yost thinks your criticism of people not staying is something he can use to good effect to nullify the need to publicly address citizen complaints.

Well, good luck to him: it doesn't seem to be working that way.

I think I'm an equal opportunity criticizer. Remember I pointed out that the council is not a law enforcement body and gave a recent example of that. And I pointed out that the mayor of little old Gretna put out a proclamation saying no biomass and the great city of Valdosta could go ahead and do that instead of waiting for somebody else to make the decision for them. And yes, I criticized the protesters for not staying. I'm not surprised various people choose to ignore part of what I said and pick up on other parts; life's like that.

I understand that some people don't like to take a strong position in public. Clearly not everybody has to be an advocate for or against any given topic.

However, my opinion is that anybody who runs for elected office should be willing to say in public what their opinion is. Sure, sometimes it's good to say "I'm thinking about it" or "I'm studying it" or even better "I'd like to know more about X": that could promote a dialog. Even "I'm working on it behind the scenes" would be a useful public statement. But elected officials refusing to take any position is ridiculous, and I see nothing wrong with laughing out loud at the ridiculous.

-jsq