« Wal-Mart Workers Need Help Now From American Government Elected Officials! George Rhynes | Main | Valdosta Board of Education considers consolidation tonight »

Sunday, 28 August 2011


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Gavin R. Putland

The reverse onus of proof in drug-possession cases is incompatible with the rule of law and therefore cannot be recognized by any court anywhere. In other words, it is UNIVERSALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Besides, the economics of the drug trade imply that criminal sanctions are self-defeating unless concentrated on RETAIL SALES. See http://is.gd/oenwod for details.

The comments to this entry are closed.


Blog powered by Typepad