« SPLOST VII campaign kicks off | Main | Our honest responses to HUD George Rhynes and John Robinson »

Thursday, 27 September 2012


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Karen Noll

Keep in mind that this company is based in Virginia, so our tax dollars from say, South Georgia meant for our school teachers, administraters, supplies, and educating our students, would go to bolster the economy in Virginia and line the pockets of the very rich. Meanwhile we have to raise taxes to simply educate the students attending our public schools. This is clearly NOT a plan to 'improve academic achievement' as the preamble boldly lies.
The preamble is boldly inaccurate and completely biased. The wording added to the question on the ballot implies that the amendment would improve student achievement and parent involvement. My stars, what breathing individual doesn't want those things.
Facts are that by some measures charter schools perform 3% worse than traditional public schools. We would hope that schools where parents have to sign a commitment of parent involvement would have superior parent involvement. Might I just add that students can be kicked out of charter schools and all students are educated in the Traditional Public School setting as per our Georgia constitution.
The 'biased and inaccurate' wording in the preamble to the charter schools question is not found in HB 1162, the law that allowed this question to be placed on the ballot. It is not in HB 797, the law thaw would be enacted should the amendment pass. NO the wording that is on the preamble comes straight out of ALEC documents, which are the equivalent of 'legislation for Dummies' with a particular slant as you might imagine.

The comments to this entry are closed.


Blog powered by Typepad